Links and Codes:
Consensus: https://get.consensus.app/andy25 (25% off with the code: andy25)
Paperpal: https://paperpal.com/?linkId=lp_72673... (PAP20 - 20% off)
Thesify: https://thesify.ai?fpr=andy60
Thesis AI: https://www.thesisai.io/?via=andrew, ANDY20 - 20% off
Elicit: https://elicit.com/?via=andrew
UndetectableAI: https://undetectable.ai?fpr=andy
SciSpace: https://scispace.com/?via=andy-staple... (ANDYS40: 40% off the annual plan, ANDYS20: 20% off the monthly plan)
Jenni AI: https://jenni.ai/?via=andy-stapleton (Use codes: andy30, ANDY20)
Julius AI: https://julius.ai/?via=andrew-stapleton (ANDY20 — offers 20% off)
AnswerThis: https://answerthis.io?ref=andy49 (ANDY25 - 25% off)
Anara AI: https://anara.com (ANDY20 - 20 % off)
Over the last few years I’ve tested a huge range of ai tools for research, and elicit ai has been one of the most interesting to watch evolve. It started as a relatively simple paper-finding tool, but it has gradually expanded into something that aims to support structured research reports, systematic review workflows, data extraction, and literature monitoring. In this video, I take a closer look at what that actually means in practice and whether it genuinely changes the way we approach academic work.
▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter
Join 21,000+ email subscribers receiving the free tools and academic tips directly from me:
https://academiainsider.com/newsletter/
▼ ▽ MY TOP SELLING COURSE ▼ ▽
▶ Become a Master Academic Writer With AI using my course: https://academy.academiainsider.com/c...
If you’ve ever wondered how to use elicit AI without feeling overwhelmed by features or pricing tiers, I walk through the process in a clear and practical way. This is not just an elicit AI tutorial focused on buttons and menus. I’m more interested in how the tool shapes thinking. When you ask a research question, how does the platform evaluate it? What happens when it screens sources? How transparent is the extraction process? These are the kinds of details that matter if you are using AI in serious academic contexts.
I also explore How to use elicit ai for research when you are working within real constraints, especially as a PhD student or early career researcher with limited funding. Free features can already generate structured overviews of a field, synthesise findings across dozens of papers, and allow you to chat directly with uploaded documents. That changes the starting point of a project. Instead of spending days gathering scattered PDFs, you can begin with a structured snapshot of the literature and then refine from there.
At the same time, I include an honest elicit ai review of the paid plans. Pricing, workflow limits, and feature access all influence whether a tool becomes part of your long-term research process. I reflect on whether the systematic review workflow genuinely guides beginners, how alerts reduce the cognitive load of monitoring new publications, and whether advanced features justify the cost.
More broadly, this discussion sits within a larger conversation about how AI is reshaping academic habits. Tools like elicit ai are not replacements for expertise, but they can reduce friction in literature discovery, screening, and synthesis. My aim is to help you think critically about where it fits into your workflow, how to extract real value from it, and how to decide whether it is worth integrating into your own research practice.
................................................
▼ ▽ TIMESTAMPS
00:00 Intro
03:20 What happens next?
04:02 Generated Report
04:58 Find Papers
05:54 Paper Chat
06:30 Paid Features
07:45 Systematic Review
10:00 Extract Data
10:54 Other Agents
12:24 Paper Alerts
13:49 Outro
沒有留言:
發佈留言